Ladies, Sugar Boys, let me leave you with this: If you've not been paid, nobody gets laid.
This includes sexting, dirty pictures, handjobs, etc. etc. etc. Who is gonna buy the cow if you can just read all about it on the Internet for free? It's similar to the Christian mandate of no sex till marriage.
Prostitutes get paid to grind sex organs, strippers get paid to grind their titties in someone's face, cam/chat girls/boys get paid to share their saucy details. Sugar babes get paid to spend time getting to know their sugar daddy/mama and if s/he doesn't care about your level of comfort sexually, s/he just doesn't care about your level of comfort on any level and no sense believing otherwise.
Showing posts with label sugar babe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sugar babe. Show all posts
Monday, 31 October 2011
Time is Money: Reprise
Y'all might think it rude of me to refer you to my blog rather than repeat all of these themes and words through a personal e-mail. But let's look at this realistically.
The last time I looked at the stats, my profile here had had about 100 views. So, that is only the people who have bothered to check it out, of all the people who have expressed an interest in checking me out. So, who knows how many people I have referred here, with time I could deliver those numbers. But as it rests, we can know for sure about the hundred who have come to the blog (and looked at my profile).
At 100 suitors: if I gave you each five minutes, (usually repeating what my ad/profile already made clear ;) regardless of whether you can meet my needs, which is pretty accurate cuz I rarely just send the blog with no other chatter when I respond to your e-mail/flirt, etc. Some of you know I have spent hours chatting with you in type. So, as a starting point, look at 5 minutes x 100... it's 8 1/3 hours. At an hour each, 100 hours. That's 2.5 weeks of full time work. With no reward. I've talked to far more than a hundred people for sure. And I would imagine that you kept typing at me because you liked the good feelings you got from my responses. Actually I don't have to imagine, I have heard it from you directly.
Fellas, I'll just be brutally honest, I'm not looking for a sugar daddy because I have time to spare, to entertain for free. At least with the blog, I have a product. And that just isn't true of a year spent sending private messages ;) Why a person would keep me chatting when they have no means or intentions to meet my need$, in exchange for the love and attention I bring to the table, is a lil beyond me. Mayhap it's an "if I can't have you, I can keep you busy so no one else can have you either" kinda thing, I openly admit I have no idea how the petty mind works ;)
And, despite having nothing left to give, the blog remains at your disposal, long after my Internet connection gets cut off. If at any time through our communications, in blog or in person, you have felt any relief from the loneliness that my time and attention has given you, even in having had someone to talk to about all of this, now would be the time to say thank you with an e-transfer donation to acknowledge my time. Either way, knowledge is power, do with it what you will!!
Be well Sugars, it's been a slice and a half ;)
The last time I looked at the stats, my profile here had had about 100 views. So, that is only the people who have bothered to check it out, of all the people who have expressed an interest in checking me out. So, who knows how many people I have referred here, with time I could deliver those numbers. But as it rests, we can know for sure about the hundred who have come to the blog (and looked at my profile).
At 100 suitors: if I gave you each five minutes, (usually repeating what my ad/profile already made clear ;) regardless of whether you can meet my needs, which is pretty accurate cuz I rarely just send the blog with no other chatter when I respond to your e-mail/flirt, etc. Some of you know I have spent hours chatting with you in type. So, as a starting point, look at 5 minutes x 100... it's 8 1/3 hours. At an hour each, 100 hours. That's 2.5 weeks of full time work. With no reward. I've talked to far more than a hundred people for sure. And I would imagine that you kept typing at me because you liked the good feelings you got from my responses. Actually I don't have to imagine, I have heard it from you directly.
Fellas, I'll just be brutally honest, I'm not looking for a sugar daddy because I have time to spare, to entertain for free. At least with the blog, I have a product. And that just isn't true of a year spent sending private messages ;) Why a person would keep me chatting when they have no means or intentions to meet my need$, in exchange for the love and attention I bring to the table, is a lil beyond me. Mayhap it's an "if I can't have you, I can keep you busy so no one else can have you either" kinda thing, I openly admit I have no idea how the petty mind works ;)
And, despite having nothing left to give, the blog remains at your disposal, long after my Internet connection gets cut off. If at any time through our communications, in blog or in person, you have felt any relief from the loneliness that my time and attention has given you, even in having had someone to talk to about all of this, now would be the time to say thank you with an e-transfer donation to acknowledge my time. Either way, knowledge is power, do with it what you will!!
Be well Sugars, it's been a slice and a half ;)
What's a Google?
Google is probably the largest search engine on the Internet. An example of brand popularity influencing the language, like "Kleenex" or "Bandaid"; to "google" something means to look it up on a search engine on the Internet.
A quick "google" search for "sugar relationship" yielded "About 202,000,000 results (0.15 seconds)". I have my doubts that the School of Sugar blog made the count but here it is, hand delivered ;)
I think it's safe to say that if you don't know what you're responding to, a lil research goes a long way toward not making you look lazy, lol. And there's the whole thing about not wasting your time if you're not into "BDSM, SGM, BBW, or any other brand of relationship" in the first place.
Napoleon Dynamite was right, girls only want guys who have good skills ;)
A quick "google" search for "sugar relationship" yielded "About 202,000,000 results (0.15 seconds)". I have my doubts that the School of Sugar blog made the count but here it is, hand delivered ;)
I think it's safe to say that if you don't know what you're responding to, a lil research goes a long way toward not making you look lazy, lol. And there's the whole thing about not wasting your time if you're not into "BDSM, SGM, BBW, or any other brand of relationship" in the first place.
Napoleon Dynamite was right, girls only want guys who have good skills ;)
Friday, 28 October 2011
The Earth Isn't Flat...
It would seem I'm not the only one. Lol, aside from this being the Internet, everything has been done, and done and done. I didn't invent this wheel and I won't be the last to roll it down a hill ;)
This blog is an information goldmine:
http://www.seekingarrangement.com/blog Sugar daddy dating blog for mutually beneficial arrangement advice, tips, questions, and stories. Sugar Daddy and Sugar Baby Blog
This blog is an information goldmine:
http://www.seekingarrangement.com/blog Sugar daddy dating blog for mutually beneficial arrangement advice, tips, questions, and stories. Sugar Daddy and Sugar Baby Blog
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Perception vs Reality: What's Your Perception On This Reality?
Welcome back, sugar lovers... and haters. Now, there are lots of things I am unsure of on this crazy planet. I don't understand the science behind rockets and planes and brain surgery. I'm not great with the plants. I only know English, and only moderately at that. I'm entirely unsure why anyone would keep a rodent or reptile as a pet. And I'm definitely not sure someone would be on a sugar dating site if they didn't want a sugar relationship and hated the entire dating scene in general. I mean, you don't accidentally sign up to fetlife, not knowing what it is or having an interest, no matter how peripheral, in alternative sexual lifestyles. Or black christian singles, you don't sign up there if you run the local chapter of the KKK in your town. It's just common sense.
Without further preface let me present this fairly recent conversation. Which, may I point out to all y'all who just think I wanna be right, and all the rest who are actually interested in the psychology of these human interactions we're all having, met my goal of getting another hit on the blog. Lol, bad press is still press. Shit, the site I met this gentleman on, was on the Tyra show and she was shittin' alllll over it. How many new subscribers since that little plug I wonder. Anyway, I present thee some words exchanged:
"PS": Please check out my profile to see if you might be interested in connecting with me! (This is an automated message, a "flirt" or a "wink" or a "kiss" or a "poke" style interaction)
Moi: Hey, hey M__,
Impressive number of words :) Check out my blog about sugar life, it has even more info than my profile ;) Www.schoolofsugar.blogspot.com
"PS": Well, guess what? Men have cost of living expenses too, and in any relationship with a woman, we're expected to pay for whatever we do together (dinners, trips, etc.) And yet, women demand equal pay, and so on. Your blog smacks of the idea that you, as a woman, are giving something up - as though you are not getting anything from the relationship, and sex. That is repugnant to me. I don't want to be with a woman who doesn't want to be with me, except for my wallet. You talk about self-esteem. I submit that spreading your legs for an allowance is indicative of a lack of self-esteem. I further submit that any man who pays for sex is also lacking self-esteem. And yet we do pay, in a less direct way. That's because our social conventions don't require women to be financially successful for us to admire them. The same is not true the other way around. Women look for men of means - providers. That's a big part of why women tend to be with men who are older than them. Any anthropology, sociology, or history book will tell you that. It's instinctive, and I could talk about that for days. But it comes down to this: sex and/or companionship for money is prostitution. I have no ethical or moral objections to it, but it's not for me. Wanting a guy who makes a decent living is another thing entirely.
Moi: Whoops, hit a few chords, huh? It's okay, I get that a lot.
Arrangement means what it means. I did not design the system or the world we're operating in, just a messenger. If I want chemistry with a man who can take care of me, too, that is my "fucking" prerogative.
if you don't like the game, don't play it but it IS the point of this website. Try POF it's a great resource!
Good luck and thanks for the feedback!
"PS": Your blog is offensive. It paints both men and women in a negative light. You denigrate women who want to have sexual relationships with men without being paid - saying they lack self-esteem. But in reality, they don't see themselves as just sexual objects. You, on the other hand, see your body, and sex, as some sort of one sided thing that is deserving of payment. You paint women as doing everything in life to be pleasing to men, without any sort of worthiness outside of that, and men as only being worthy because of money. It's disgusting. There are lots of women on this site who don't share your views, and I have had some good times, and ongoing friendships. Your attitude is the most cold and calculating that I've encountered. Frankly, it's delusional and disturbing. I have no doubt about your saying "I get that a lot". Not surprising. Some of us make our way in the world by doing something worthwhile. Apparently, you make your way in the world on your back, or in front of a mirror, and riding the achievements of others. Where's the self-esteem in that?
Moi: If you're offended by reality there is no way I can help you. Likewise on acting abusively when you don't like the answer.
I wish you the best and thank you for your feedback, please feel free to include your comments on the blog but please stop emailing me.
"PS": It has nothing to do with reality. It has everything to do with perception of reality, and your own place in the universe. Yours is fucked up, arrogant, and destructive. Your approach is ruthless, and devoid of any kind of warmth - decidedly unfeminine. Your profile hints at it, but your blog makes it abundantly clear. You're a disgusting individual who should seek therapy. Someday, the mirror won't be so kind to you. What then? Outer beauty only goes so far. Inner beauty is what really matters, and that, you are sorely lacking.
Without further preface let me present this fairly recent conversation. Which, may I point out to all y'all who just think I wanna be right, and all the rest who are actually interested in the psychology of these human interactions we're all having, met my goal of getting another hit on the blog. Lol, bad press is still press. Shit, the site I met this gentleman on, was on the Tyra show and she was shittin' alllll over it. How many new subscribers since that little plug I wonder. Anyway, I present thee some words exchanged:
"PS": Please check out my profile to see if you might be interested in connecting with me! (This is an automated message, a "flirt" or a "wink" or a "kiss" or a "poke" style interaction)
Moi: Hey, hey M__,
Impressive number of words :) Check out my blog about sugar life, it has even more info than my profile ;) Www.schoolofsugar.blogspot.com
"PS": Well, guess what? Men have cost of living expenses too, and in any relationship with a woman, we're expected to pay for whatever we do together (dinners, trips, etc.) And yet, women demand equal pay, and so on. Your blog smacks of the idea that you, as a woman, are giving something up - as though you are not getting anything from the relationship, and sex. That is repugnant to me. I don't want to be with a woman who doesn't want to be with me, except for my wallet. You talk about self-esteem. I submit that spreading your legs for an allowance is indicative of a lack of self-esteem. I further submit that any man who pays for sex is also lacking self-esteem. And yet we do pay, in a less direct way. That's because our social conventions don't require women to be financially successful for us to admire them. The same is not true the other way around. Women look for men of means - providers. That's a big part of why women tend to be with men who are older than them. Any anthropology, sociology, or history book will tell you that. It's instinctive, and I could talk about that for days. But it comes down to this: sex and/or companionship for money is prostitution. I have no ethical or moral objections to it, but it's not for me. Wanting a guy who makes a decent living is another thing entirely.
Moi: Whoops, hit a few chords, huh? It's okay, I get that a lot.
Arrangement means what it means. I did not design the system or the world we're operating in, just a messenger. If I want chemistry with a man who can take care of me, too, that is my "fucking" prerogative.
if you don't like the game, don't play it but it IS the point of this website. Try POF it's a great resource!
Good luck and thanks for the feedback!
"PS": Your blog is offensive. It paints both men and women in a negative light. You denigrate women who want to have sexual relationships with men without being paid - saying they lack self-esteem. But in reality, they don't see themselves as just sexual objects. You, on the other hand, see your body, and sex, as some sort of one sided thing that is deserving of payment. You paint women as doing everything in life to be pleasing to men, without any sort of worthiness outside of that, and men as only being worthy because of money. It's disgusting. There are lots of women on this site who don't share your views, and I have had some good times, and ongoing friendships. Your attitude is the most cold and calculating that I've encountered. Frankly, it's delusional and disturbing. I have no doubt about your saying "I get that a lot". Not surprising. Some of us make our way in the world by doing something worthwhile. Apparently, you make your way in the world on your back, or in front of a mirror, and riding the achievements of others. Where's the self-esteem in that?
Moi: If you're offended by reality there is no way I can help you. Likewise on acting abusively when you don't like the answer.
I wish you the best and thank you for your feedback, please feel free to include your comments on the blog but please stop emailing me.
"PS": It has nothing to do with reality. It has everything to do with perception of reality, and your own place in the universe. Yours is fucked up, arrogant, and destructive. Your approach is ruthless, and devoid of any kind of warmth - decidedly unfeminine. Your profile hints at it, but your blog makes it abundantly clear. You're a disgusting individual who should seek therapy. Someday, the mirror won't be so kind to you. What then? Outer beauty only goes so far. Inner beauty is what really matters, and that, you are sorely lacking.
Lmao, As If This Will Be The Last Word On This One
The glossary grows...
"Arriving at a workable definition of what is prostitution is very difficult, since not even the government can agree on what exactly constitutes the offence. Prostitution is the exchange of sexual favours for money or other material goods, devoid of any emotional involvement."
Source:
http://web.viu.ca/crim/Student/Sturdy.htm
Great essay!
Taking a girl to dinner does not make you a sugar daddy. Alternately, on the same side of the coin, paying an, or any, girl to fuck you does not make you a sugar daddy.
"Arriving at a workable definition of what is prostitution is very difficult, since not even the government can agree on what exactly constitutes the offence. Prostitution is the exchange of sexual favours for money or other material goods, devoid of any emotional involvement."
Source:
http://web.viu.ca/crim/Student/Sturdy.htm
Great essay!
Taking a girl to dinner does not make you a sugar daddy. Alternately, on the same side of the coin, paying an, or any, girl to fuck you does not make you a sugar daddy.
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Grey Areas That Are Black and White
In our continuous efforts to clearly define what it is we are here in Sugar Land after, let's throw down into the glossary of terms again.
On a technicality, relationsugars do qualify as sex trade industry. But on that same technicality, so is marriage. In fact, marriage is the biggest prostitution scam going. Ladies, you know what I am talking about on this one. Good Sirs, you also know what I am talkin' about on this one.
Ad nauseum, at this point, but allow me to present the difference between a standard hooker and a sugar babe.
With the lady of the night, she tells you, "greek, g.f.e., msog", you present her fee, she presents her sweet lady bits. As long as you wear a condom and don't try to rape her, you WILL "get some". It's a for sure thing, money for sex.
On the other hand, a sugar babe agrees to sell you her time. Time is not sex. It might become time spent sexually but ultimately it's a part time hot girlfriend role-play until it's determined that you are a qualified sugar daddy whom she can trust and count on. You're simply getting the chance to spend time with her. Yes, to see if you're going to knock boots, but the only sure thing is that you will spend time together for money. And if she can't count on you for the coin, there shan't be any booty shared.
And again... "pay per visit" is prostitute lexicon, not something a sugar babe can "count on".
On a technicality, relationsugars do qualify as sex trade industry. But on that same technicality, so is marriage. In fact, marriage is the biggest prostitution scam going. Ladies, you know what I am talking about on this one. Good Sirs, you also know what I am talkin' about on this one.
Ad nauseum, at this point, but allow me to present the difference between a standard hooker and a sugar babe.
With the lady of the night, she tells you, "greek, g.f.e., msog", you present her fee, she presents her sweet lady bits. As long as you wear a condom and don't try to rape her, you WILL "get some". It's a for sure thing, money for sex.
On the other hand, a sugar babe agrees to sell you her time. Time is not sex. It might become time spent sexually but ultimately it's a part time hot girlfriend role-play until it's determined that you are a qualified sugar daddy whom she can trust and count on. You're simply getting the chance to spend time with her. Yes, to see if you're going to knock boots, but the only sure thing is that you will spend time together for money. And if she can't count on you for the coin, there shan't be any booty shared.
And again... "pay per visit" is prostitute lexicon, not something a sugar babe can "count on".
Vulnerability
"SOS, please someone help me"... let us address the obvious today!
Whether it's obvious or not (apparently more often ;), let us bring to the forefront what a relationsugar really is. Guys are looking for companionship and sex, the ladies are looking to be taken care of financially in exchange for that affection. It is negligent and ignorant to assume otherwise.
Soooo, let me spell it out a little further. Women are vulnerable by design. And when a woman is looking for a sugar daddy it is because she is experiencing some financial vulnerability, too. And acknowledging that openly. She'll still be vulnerable if she doesn't have to stress about rent. She just won't be stressed anymore. And you get to enjoy that stress free version of this lovely little thing.
Whether she is a single mom, a student, a business owner or someone with a chronic illness (lots of them don't show on the surface so you can't make assumptions based on the cover of the book) she is openly admitting that she needs some help to get by. Therefore she has acknowledged her vulnerability and there is no need to make her prove it. I understand that you're just trying to gauge whether or not she would be open, receptive and vulnerable sexually but that will ONLY come about if you can meet her needs financially (assuming chemistry of course). Stress relief exchange. Exchange!!
Granted there are some women in this for the wrong reasons, IMHO, but who am I to say that a life of Louis Vitton and W Hotels is a bad thing in exchange for being pretty. But in reality, most of the women I have talked to regarding sugar life are genuinely kind, hard working women who're kinda fucked financially and just trying to get by in this crazy world we livin' in. Just like the men, only our needs are a little different.
But yes, she is "using" you for your money, just as you are "using" her because she has tittays. Sure, it's not all that glib, if you're not interested in each other fundamentally it will never get to the usership we've come here to engage in. But illusions that a relationsugar is anything more than a very clearly defined exchange are simply a waste of everyone's time.
Soooo, just like you're not entertaining women who are looking for a husband/baby daddy, don't be insulted when she doesn't want to entertain a man who can't meet her needs financially. Time is money, and wasting time chatting with a woman who wants to get married and babied up is not a good investment of your time if you're just looking for a booty call. So, why would a woman want to continue to "chat" if you're not in her budget range???? It's not personal, it's based on an honest awareness of one's needs. Which includes not having an abundance of time to waste ;)
And while it can be disturbing to address the reality that women are far more vulnerable to sexual exploit, it is crucial to be aware that there are Jeffrey Dahmers and Robert Picktons in this world. Ladies, YOU need to keep yourself safe. Not paranoid, simply aware. That you are a delicate little flower and need be handled with care at all times. Gentlemen, YOU need to be aware that she needs to feels safe, cuz she's a delicate little flower that needs to be handled with care at all times who wants to blossom.
It's just real, not anything to get overwhelmed about. Misogyny is rampant in our society. Relationsugaring addresses that imbalance by adding the levener* that actually enables a "mutually beneficial arrangement". We're here because we are doing things differently. Or maybe you're lost on the Internet ;P
*levener is a cooking term (but this is chemistry, too so it's apt ;) : substances used in doughs and batters that cause a foaming action which lightens and softens the finished product
Whether it's obvious or not (apparently more often ;), let us bring to the forefront what a relationsugar really is. Guys are looking for companionship and sex, the ladies are looking to be taken care of financially in exchange for that affection. It is negligent and ignorant to assume otherwise.
Soooo, let me spell it out a little further. Women are vulnerable by design. And when a woman is looking for a sugar daddy it is because she is experiencing some financial vulnerability, too. And acknowledging that openly. She'll still be vulnerable if she doesn't have to stress about rent. She just won't be stressed anymore. And you get to enjoy that stress free version of this lovely little thing.
Whether she is a single mom, a student, a business owner or someone with a chronic illness (lots of them don't show on the surface so you can't make assumptions based on the cover of the book) she is openly admitting that she needs some help to get by. Therefore she has acknowledged her vulnerability and there is no need to make her prove it. I understand that you're just trying to gauge whether or not she would be open, receptive and vulnerable sexually but that will ONLY come about if you can meet her needs financially (assuming chemistry of course). Stress relief exchange. Exchange!!
Granted there are some women in this for the wrong reasons, IMHO, but who am I to say that a life of Louis Vitton and W Hotels is a bad thing in exchange for being pretty. But in reality, most of the women I have talked to regarding sugar life are genuinely kind, hard working women who're kinda fucked financially and just trying to get by in this crazy world we livin' in. Just like the men, only our needs are a little different.
But yes, she is "using" you for your money, just as you are "using" her because she has tittays. Sure, it's not all that glib, if you're not interested in each other fundamentally it will never get to the usership we've come here to engage in. But illusions that a relationsugar is anything more than a very clearly defined exchange are simply a waste of everyone's time.
Soooo, just like you're not entertaining women who are looking for a husband/baby daddy, don't be insulted when she doesn't want to entertain a man who can't meet her needs financially. Time is money, and wasting time chatting with a woman who wants to get married and babied up is not a good investment of your time if you're just looking for a booty call. So, why would a woman want to continue to "chat" if you're not in her budget range???? It's not personal, it's based on an honest awareness of one's needs. Which includes not having an abundance of time to waste ;)
And while it can be disturbing to address the reality that women are far more vulnerable to sexual exploit, it is crucial to be aware that there are Jeffrey Dahmers and Robert Picktons in this world. Ladies, YOU need to keep yourself safe. Not paranoid, simply aware. That you are a delicate little flower and need be handled with care at all times. Gentlemen, YOU need to be aware that she needs to feels safe, cuz she's a delicate little flower that needs to be handled with care at all times who wants to blossom.
It's just real, not anything to get overwhelmed about. Misogyny is rampant in our society. Relationsugaring addresses that imbalance by adding the levener* that actually enables a "mutually beneficial arrangement". We're here because we are doing things differently. Or maybe you're lost on the Internet ;P
*levener is a cooking term (but this is chemistry, too so it's apt ;) : substances used in doughs and batters that cause a foaming action which lightens and softens the finished product
Monday, 24 October 2011
This Is Not A Simulation
This, friends and well-wishers, is a real conversation I had with a man whom I believe honestly believes he is sugar material. I'll openly acknowledge that it was probably a lil bit mean to toy with him and play on words with an individual who sincerely just isn't "gettin' it". But if you have any sense of humour at all, you will easily see how I couldn't resist the lil bit of good natured fun that it was. I can't blame TV but maybe if it was more entertaining I wouldn't be so easily amused by hilarious word exchanges with randoms from the internet.
The "here sugar, sugar" advertisement he responded to asked for these specifics: male 30-50, a photo and budget/expectations.
I tried to keep it simple. General literacy and manners can be determined from the response itself, I felt listing those prerequisites would only add confusion. I'll post the ad, too, if you're interested in further applied psychology behind presentation in the sugar arena. There will be a post befo' too long about photos. But for now, this is an actual conversation, presented as it happened, in response to that ad. I just mean, I could write shit this good, but I really couldn't write shit this good. Enjoy!
"Potential Suitor": Hey how it going. I am 20. I am willing to take u out for dinner and help u out when anyway u need. I not looking for a one night stand. I want an ongoing thing
The "here sugar, sugar" advertisement he responded to asked for these specifics: male 30-50, a photo and budget/expectations.
I tried to keep it simple. General literacy and manners can be determined from the response itself, I felt listing those prerequisites would only add confusion. I'll post the ad, too, if you're interested in further applied psychology behind presentation in the sugar arena. There will be a post befo' too long about photos. But for now, this is an actual conversation, presented as it happened, in response to that ad. I just mean, I could write shit this good, but I really couldn't write shit this good. Enjoy!
Moi: Fantastic, I definitely have an $8000 bill I need to cover! Lol, I don't mean to be rude but I'm not sure you fully understand my post on cl. Taking me out for dinner is a given, relationsugar or regular boyfriend ;) but I'm looking for a relationsugar specifically this time around ;)
AND you didn't include a photo...
"PS": Hey. Sorry. I'd give u 300 towards it. [Includes photo w response]
Moi: For dinner? Done deal! When would you like to dine?
"PS": Dinner and 300. Or just dinner. Do I get a pc
"PS": Dinner and 300. Or just dinner. Do I get a pc [yes, he sent it again]
"PS": When u free
Moi: Lol, both... And I'll explain what a relationsugar is to you for free ;) I have time tomorrow, maybe early Friday evening depending on work.
"PS": Sounds good. As long as we get to havge fun after
Moi: ... Lol, lol... As I said initially, it's apparent you didn't fully understand my post ;) good luck w the reading comprehension and the dating game :)
"PS": O:(
"PS": I no what it is. It just last time I give a girl 400. I never got laid or anything out of it. That why I won't give large amounts out at once. Can u send a pc
"PS": I no what it is. It just last time I give a girl 400. I never got laid or anything out of it. That why I won't give large amounts out at once. Can u send a pc [yes, he sent it again]
AND you didn't include a photo...
"PS": Hey. Sorry. I'd give u 300 towards it. [Includes photo w response]
Moi: For dinner? Done deal! When would you like to dine?
"PS": Dinner and 300. Or just dinner. Do I get a pc
"PS": Dinner and 300. Or just dinner. Do I get a pc [yes, he sent it again]
"PS": When u free
Moi: Lol, both... And I'll explain what a relationsugar is to you for free ;) I have time tomorrow, maybe early Friday evening depending on work.
"PS": Sounds good. As long as we get to havge fun after
Moi: ... Lol, lol... As I said initially, it's apparent you didn't fully understand my post ;) good luck w the reading comprehension and the dating game :)
"PS": O:(
"PS": I no what it is. It just last time I give a girl 400. I never got laid or anything out of it. That why I won't give large amounts out at once. Can u send a pc
"PS": I no what it is. It just last time I give a girl 400. I never got laid or anything out of it. That why I won't give large amounts out at once. Can u send a pc [yes, he sent it again]
Moi: You're confusing prostitute with sugar baby. Check out my blog SOS www.schoolofsugar.blogspot.com I'll blog about this in more detail when I have time but time is money, so ya jus' goan hafta wait I s'pose!
K, I shan't talk again so soon about expecting sex, a la Pro Contract, when you offer to take a potential sugar babe out for dinner and offer some cash to acknowledge her time and get your foot in the door by letting her know you were serious. So, I'll talk about the fact that if you see $400 as a "large amount"... um, perhaps sugaring isn't for you and you'd be better off as a Thoughtful Lover who spoils his lady friend with a spa day every once in a while.
I will address the fact that I was a fun bitch about it, rather than just let it go. But I've been told I'm a bitch for walking away when I show up for a first meeting and the person at the table isn't the person from the picture exchange. Whether because they used a fake picture entirely or because it was ten years old. Lying is totally unnecessary in a relationsugar and I won't waste more time on someone who has already wasted my time not being honest. And with any contract, language use is of utmost importance. So, I was playin' on words, cuz it's fun.
And I will address the fact that we now we all have the opportunity to explore these themes together, too. Like the idea that if a woman asks for a few simple things to help screen out "potential" from "unqualified", she's committing preliminary testing for incongruencies and has asked for those details on purpose because...
*while men may generally receive very few responses from women on the internet, a woman generally doesn't even need to be hot in any traditional sense to get a barrage of attention from claimants. Time is money...
*in Sugar Land, everyone claims to be affluent. Time for money is the only way she can know you're for "real" real, not for "play" play.
*women really do need to exercise a lot more caution when meeting strangers. Especially when the pretenses are sexual.
Not only was this particular respondent waaaayyyyy out of the age range in the wrong direction, he neglected to define his budget/expectations, as well as include a photo. 0/3, that's actually 0/5, with manners and literacy all in... what's a girl to do with that?
And his claim was that he would "help out when anyway [I] need". So, I called him on that (not even sure how to interpret those word strings*), knowing that he wasn't even qualified to be on the internet, let alone responding to live humans via said media. Lol, perhaps that was a little harsh but with all due respect, B, my email status does say "Can't say I didn't warn ya!"
If you can't make good on some information, she won't be willing to believe you will make good on the rest. And you will be cut from tryouts. Doubly if you throw a hissy fit (whiny, abusive or otherwise) when presented with the fact that you've yet to reveal the information she's asked for, so she's not willing to believe you will come through on the rest. Actions speak louder than words but a clever sort can always filter the words for the forthcoming interactions she can expect.
K, I shan't talk again so soon about expecting sex, a la Pro Contract, when you offer to take a potential sugar babe out for dinner and offer some cash to acknowledge her time and get your foot in the door by letting her know you were serious. So, I'll talk about the fact that if you see $400 as a "large amount"... um, perhaps sugaring isn't for you and you'd be better off as a Thoughtful Lover who spoils his lady friend with a spa day every once in a while.
I will address the fact that I was a fun bitch about it, rather than just let it go. But I've been told I'm a bitch for walking away when I show up for a first meeting and the person at the table isn't the person from the picture exchange. Whether because they used a fake picture entirely or because it was ten years old. Lying is totally unnecessary in a relationsugar and I won't waste more time on someone who has already wasted my time not being honest. And with any contract, language use is of utmost importance. So, I was playin' on words, cuz it's fun.
And I will address the fact that we now we all have the opportunity to explore these themes together, too. Like the idea that if a woman asks for a few simple things to help screen out "potential" from "unqualified", she's committing preliminary testing for incongruencies and has asked for those details on purpose because...
*while men may generally receive very few responses from women on the internet, a woman generally doesn't even need to be hot in any traditional sense to get a barrage of attention from claimants. Time is money...
*in Sugar Land, everyone claims to be affluent. Time for money is the only way she can know you're for "real" real, not for "play" play.
*women really do need to exercise a lot more caution when meeting strangers. Especially when the pretenses are sexual.
Not only was this particular respondent waaaayyyyy out of the age range in the wrong direction, he neglected to define his budget/expectations, as well as include a photo. 0/3, that's actually 0/5, with manners and literacy all in... what's a girl to do with that?
And his claim was that he would "help out when anyway [I] need". So, I called him on that (not even sure how to interpret those word strings*), knowing that he wasn't even qualified to be on the internet, let alone responding to live humans via said media. Lol, perhaps that was a little harsh but with all due respect, B, my email status does say "Can't say I didn't warn ya!"
If you can't make good on some information, she won't be willing to believe you will make good on the rest. And you will be cut from tryouts. Doubly if you throw a hissy fit (whiny, abusive or otherwise) when presented with the fact that you've yet to reveal the information she's asked for, so she's not willing to believe you will come through on the rest. Actions speak louder than words but a clever sort can always filter the words for the forthcoming interactions she can expect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)